✅ ADR 0001: Eating burger for lunch

status

accepted

date

2024-10-10

deciders

  • Alexander Eimer

consulted

  • Alex Krause

informed

  • n/a

Context and problem statement

For lunch it is often hard to decide between the options. This ADR should help to find a solution to that question.

Decision drivers

  • Live healthier

  • Have lunch with colleagues

  • Save money

Considered options

Decision outcome

Chosen option: "Have burger for lunch", because it is more fun and tested better.

Consequences

  • Good, because I look forward to have lunch

  • Good, because I can eat with my colleagues

  • Bad, because I will spend more money

  • Bad, because I will get fat

Pros and cons of the options

Have burger for lunch

Eating out in a nice burger diner is fun and many colleagues will join that lunch. It will have a bad impact on the spend money and the health.

  • Good, because join colleagues

  • Good, because yummy

  • Bad, because it costs more

  • Bad, because it’s unhealthy

Have a salad for lunch

Going to the store and buying a salad is boring. Only a few colleagues will join this activity. Although, it will be cheaper and healthier.

  • Good, because health

  • Good, because cheaper

  • Bad, because it’s boring

  • Bad, because I will go alone

More information

n/a